Slowpoke
05-11-2008, 11:12 PM
So the wife's car hit 6 years and 125,000km and the automatic tranny is showing slip/slam engagement in DRIVE while in stop and go traffic. Dealer diagnosis: Needs a new tranny. No big deal, that's why Honda extended the warranty to 7 years, 168,000. It's a well-known problem on these transmissions.
After negotiating 15% off parts and labour, I've decided to let the dealer do some other work, just because they DO provide a loaner for the wife to get to work in, and they ARE OE parts. If my wife doesn't like some aftermarket choice I make for dampers, I'll have to answer for it. So, I'm not above paying some dealership premium to get a quiet wife. All too rare a thing ya know. :rolleyes:
The car also needs new front struts (LF is leaking and no longer dampening, RF is 'okay" but I replace in pairs.) They also say the ball joints have excess play. Didn't feel like that to me when I changed the snow tires over, but 125,000km on the original pieces, I'm not going to argue since I'm paying for an alignment after the strut change anyway.
So a couple of other things sounded odd to me:
We need two engine mounts?? Passenger side one that looks like a wheel on a tower, and the big column one. (If it's not obvious what I'm speaking of, I can try to scan the parts photo.) While the tranny is out, they're saying labour will only be one hour instead of two, which doesn't sound brutal.
Question #1: Do these really fail so soon on these models? Or is this probably a creative interpretation of "worn"?
I've dealt with some bitchy ball joints before in my life, but they're quoting 1 hour per ball joint.
Question #2: Is that really the Honda book rate? I mean, it's already up on the hoist and wheels off to do the strut change on each front corner.
Honda book is pretty specific about using their ATF (which I did, at 48k and ~96k) and that got me a toasted tranny anyway. Talking to the service advisor, apparently Honda has made NO modifications to the replacement trannies that is supposed to make the next one last any longer. I only have one year left of extended warranty, so I figure I have very little to lose by asking them to put a proper synthetic tranny fluid it. I know in the US they have to quote a standard fluid spec, but in Canada they don't legally have to. And their manual doesnt. It's the Honda fluid only.
Question #3: Opinions on WHICH synthetic to use with this grenade waiting to blow?
Question #4: Do they have a leg to stand on with the fluid issue if my new tranny fails in less than a year? I've never had to defend the use of synthetics before, but ... you know dealers.
I have to decide by Monday night latest, to get some fluid ordered for Tuesday night.
Thanks for your thoughts.
After negotiating 15% off parts and labour, I've decided to let the dealer do some other work, just because they DO provide a loaner for the wife to get to work in, and they ARE OE parts. If my wife doesn't like some aftermarket choice I make for dampers, I'll have to answer for it. So, I'm not above paying some dealership premium to get a quiet wife. All too rare a thing ya know. :rolleyes:
The car also needs new front struts (LF is leaking and no longer dampening, RF is 'okay" but I replace in pairs.) They also say the ball joints have excess play. Didn't feel like that to me when I changed the snow tires over, but 125,000km on the original pieces, I'm not going to argue since I'm paying for an alignment after the strut change anyway.
So a couple of other things sounded odd to me:
We need two engine mounts?? Passenger side one that looks like a wheel on a tower, and the big column one. (If it's not obvious what I'm speaking of, I can try to scan the parts photo.) While the tranny is out, they're saying labour will only be one hour instead of two, which doesn't sound brutal.
Question #1: Do these really fail so soon on these models? Or is this probably a creative interpretation of "worn"?
I've dealt with some bitchy ball joints before in my life, but they're quoting 1 hour per ball joint.
Question #2: Is that really the Honda book rate? I mean, it's already up on the hoist and wheels off to do the strut change on each front corner.
Honda book is pretty specific about using their ATF (which I did, at 48k and ~96k) and that got me a toasted tranny anyway. Talking to the service advisor, apparently Honda has made NO modifications to the replacement trannies that is supposed to make the next one last any longer. I only have one year left of extended warranty, so I figure I have very little to lose by asking them to put a proper synthetic tranny fluid it. I know in the US they have to quote a standard fluid spec, but in Canada they don't legally have to. And their manual doesnt. It's the Honda fluid only.
Question #3: Opinions on WHICH synthetic to use with this grenade waiting to blow?
Question #4: Do they have a leg to stand on with the fluid issue if my new tranny fails in less than a year? I've never had to defend the use of synthetics before, but ... you know dealers.
I have to decide by Monday night latest, to get some fluid ordered for Tuesday night.
Thanks for your thoughts.